Layer 1 Faces 'Survival of the Fittest' Era... ZetaChain and Harmony Ride on Solana and Ethereum
[Block Media Reporter Ham Ji-hyun] The strategy for survival in the competition to build independent Layer 1 (L1) blockchains is changing. Instead of maintaining their own validators and consensus networks, projects are increasingly utilizing the security, developer, and liquidity infrastructure of large blockchains like Solana and Ethereum.
However, the reasons for abandoning L1 vary. ZetaChain has shifted its business focus to AI applications, raising the question, "Is a standalone chain really necessary?" In contrast, Harmony has faced escalating costs and risks in defending its independent network due to repeated security incidents.
ZetaChain and Harmony Abandon Their Own Layer 1... "Focusing on AI"
According to industry sources on the 22nd, the ZetaChain community voted 99.4% in favor of governance proposal 68, which gradually phases out its own L1 and issues ZETA tokens as SPL-based tokens on the Solana network. The voter participation rate was 58%, surpassing the quorum of 40%.
Since its launch in 2021, ZetaChain has positioned cross-chain interoperability connecting different blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum as its core business. However, it has recently shifted its focus to the privacy-oriented AI application 'Anuma.'
In the proposal, ZetaChain cited the burden of continuously coordinating security patches and updates from upper software with validators to maintain a Cosmos SDK-based chain. It explained that the speed of vulnerability discovery has increased due to advancements in AI tools, potentially leading to greater maintenance burdens in the future.
As a result, ZetaChain has chosen to leave network security and consensus to Solana while concentrating its development capabilities on user applications like Anuma.
Thus, ZetaChain's abandonment of L1 can be seen not as a withdrawal due to business failure, but as a strategic shift from being a "company that directly operates a blockchain" to a "company that creates AI services on top of large blockchains."
Harmony also proposed to end its own L1 this month and transfer the ONE token to an Ethereum ERC-20 token. It plans to focus its efforts on a "remix economy" business centered around AI video creators.
On the surface, it appears similar to ZetaChain's structure of "ending L1 → focusing on AI business," but for Harmony, repeated security incidents have been the backdrop for discussions about ending the chain.
Harmony suffered approximately $100 million in damages from the Horizon Bridge attack in 2022. Subsequently, in August 2026, a vulnerability in cross-shard transaction verification was exploited, leading to an incident where attackers repeatedly used multiple transactions to counterfeit over 3 trillion ONE tokens.
Ultimately, Harmony pushed for a rollback to a point before the attack. In this process, normal transactions that occurred after the attack were also discarded, resulting in over 109,000 transactions disappearing from the records.
Harmony explained that continuing to operate its own L1 would lead to increasing security burdens to respond to nation-state attackers and AI-based attack tools.
The transition of Harmony's ONE to an Ethereum ERC-20 token is also being considered after the chain's termination. However, the current proposal is non-binding, and the final termination block or specific transition schedule has not yet been determined.
Celo and Ronin: Transitioning to Ethereum L2 Without Eliminating Their Chains
While ZetaChain and Harmony are moving towards terminating their independent chains, Celo and Ronin have chosen a different path.
Celo transitioned from an independent EVM-compatible L1 to an OP Stack-based Ethereum Layer 2 (L2) in March 2025. This approach maintains the state and applications of the existing chain while connecting payment and security structures to Ethereum.
The game-specialized blockchain Ronin also completed its transition to an OP Stack-based Ethereum L2 in May of this year. It changed its structure to rely on Ethereum for security and final settlement while maintaining the identity of its own network.
As a result, the four projects can be broadly categorized into two groups.
ZetaChain and Harmony are terminating their independent L1s and transferring only their tokens to large chains. In contrast, Celo and Ronin are changing their structures to Ethereum L2 while maintaining their existing networks and states.
The reasons for these decisions can be further divided: ZetaChain focuses on business efficiency, Harmony on security burdens, and Celo and Ronin on leveraging Ethereum's security and liquidity while trying to maintain their network identities.
"Is a Standalone L1 Really Necessary?"... Layer 1 Faces 'Survival of the Fittest' Era
Projects with their own L1 have the advantage of being able to design gas tokens, staking, and validator policies independently.
On the other hand, they must independently secure consensus algorithms, node software management, validator rewards, security patches, bridge operations, as well as developers, users, and liquidity. If they do not grow sufficiently in scale, these costs remain a continuous burden for the project.
Conversely, by riding on Ethereum or Solana, they may relinquish some control over their own consensus networks, but they can utilize the already established security, development tools, users, and liquidity.
As a result, the competitive standards in the blockchain industry are also changing.
In the past, having an independent L1 was a symbol of a project's technical prowess and independence, but recently, the question of whether a truly independent chain is necessary for operating a service has become more important in terms of economics and sustainability.
This judgment is also reflected in other digital asset projects recently.
Ethena founder Guy Young stated in an interview with The Block this month that he considered building a standalone blockchain but would have considered it "a mistake" if he had pursued it.
Young assessed that the market is no longer at a stage where it demands additional "universal chains" that aim to provide everything to everyone. If a project directly owns its infrastructure, it may lead to competition with existing partners rather than focusing on the growth of its core products.
However, Hashib Qureshi, managing partner at Dragonfly Capital, expressed concerns on the 17th about the 'winner-takes-all' structure where large Layer 1 chains like Ethereum and Solana dominate all markets.
He criticized that as real-world assets (RWA) such as stocks and bonds move to blockchain, the regulatory compliance and operational methods of financial institutions vary, necessitating the coexistence of various specialized blockchains. He stated, "Each network has network effects, but one network cannot indefinitely absorb all economic activities."
-- Price
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

ZetaChain Proposes L1 Shutdown Amid Solana Migration, Plans to Burn 55 Million ZETA

ZetaChain Proposes Migration Mechanism and Timeline to Solana

How will ZetaChain advance its new AI layout in the "Great Migration" to the Solana ecosystem?

Zcash Foundation disowns ZRC-20 and CASH token

ZetaChain, Linera, Switchboard Cease Operations

ZetaChain's AI Application Anuma Surpasses 200,000 Users

ZetaChain Introduces Anthropic's Claude Opus 5, Offers Free Access to ZETA Stakers

AI girlfriend apps generate 427.3 million dollars in consumer spending
The ZetaChain vulnerability was reported in advance by white hats but was ignored, ultimately leading to a $334,000 attack incident

ZetaChain: Previously targeted vulnerability attacks did not result in user fund losses, mainnet patch has been deployed

ZetaChain: Previous targeted attacks did not affect user funds, mainnet patch has been deployed

ZetaChain was attacked, exploiting a vulnerability that may stem from a defect in the GatewayZEVM call function

ZetaChain announced that the GatewayEVM contract has been attacked and cross-chain transactions have been suspended

RootData: ZETA will unlock tokens worth approximately $2.38 million in one week

Greece ends years of crypto tax uncertainty with new 10% levy on Bitcoin profits

Ethereum software bug triggers emergency fixes across major layer-2 networks

Kraken Owner Invests in Altcoin, Considers Further Purchases. You Should Recognize Him

Stablecoins offer sub-cent payments, Armstrong says, as critics flag risks

Analysis: Stablecoins, Payments, and Prediction Markets Have Become New Growth Points for Crypto Companies, but Profitability Remains Challenged

Nubank Suspends Crypto Withdrawals: What We Know So Far

Buffett's Successor Faces Setback, Google Holdings Show $3 Billion Unrealized Loss

Banking Outage in Japan: 128 Banks 'Frozen' at Once

Beyond APY: Saying Goodbye to Black Box Trust and Reassessing the Security Logic of ETH Staking

Argentine Bitcoiners Debut “The Genesis Of Satoshi Nakamoto” Artwork In Downtown Buenos Aires

Broadcom (AVGO) : AI Growth, Fund Positioning, and Guarantee Risk
Broadcom (AVGO) recently fell with the semiconductor sector, closing down 10.43% at $291.53 on November 5. The shares rebounded more than 4% in premarket trading on November 6. Concerns that election results could lead to tighter AI rules and slower data center approvals contributed to a broad sell-off, with a semiconductor index falling about 12%. The move appears tied mainly to sector sentiment and policy concerns, with no clear company-specific negative catalyst identified.
Institutional trading and AI growth expectations are also in focus. ARK funds sold about $134 million of Broadcom shares over two sessions while adding to SpaceX. Citi maintained its Buy rating and projected that Broadcom’s AI semiconductor revenue could reach $115 billion in fiscal 2027, roughly doubling year over year. Broadcom had approximately $179.2 billion in signed contracts as of the prior quarter, while analysts estimated fourth-quarter AI chip revenue at about $21.7 billion. These forecasts will need to be tested against future results.
Contingent guarantees are another point for investors to monitor. Broadcom is providing guarantees tied to Anthropic’s AI rack-leasing arrangement, involving about $29 billion in the first phase and a second-phase plan of up to $43 billion. Banks plan to issue $21 billion in bonds to support related chip financing. The guarantee amounts are not the same as debt already incurred, but they add a potential risk to assess. Broadcom is scheduled to report its next quarterly results on December 9, when management’s outlook for fiscal 2027 AI demand will be closely watched. This article is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice.

Netflix (NFLX) Stock Rebounds: Insider Sales, Advertising, and Growth Plans
Several Netflix executives sold company shares in early November 2026. Co-CEO Theodore Sarandos sold 27,312 shares from November 3 to 4, valued at about $1.81 million. CFO Spencer Neumann sold shares worth approximately $612,000. Co-CEO Gregory Peters realized about $1.69 million, including transactions related to tax withholding. Chief Legal Officer David Hyman and director Bradford Smith also reduced their holdings. Executive sales can have different reasons and should not be viewed on their own as a measure of the company’s outlook.
After recent pressure, Netflix shares rebounded more than 4% around November 4. Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management allocated about 5% of its portfolio to Netflix, while new AI features and positive views on the company’s technology prospects helped sentiment. Netflix reported third-quarter 2026 revenue of $13.44 billion and earnings per share of $0.87, both above expectations, though its forward outlook remains a key focus.
Advertising is one of Netflix’s main challenges. Delays to key ad product features led the company to reduce its annual advertising revenue outlook from $3 billion to $2.7 billion. Viewer engagement has also faced pressure from changes in content appeal and competition from platforms such as YouTube. Netflix is pursuing growth through live events, gaming, and advertising, with plans to expand its ad-supported offering to 15 markets while adjusting its workforce by about 6% to improve margins. Investors may want to monitor advertising growth, engagement, and profitability. This article is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice.

Carvana Earnings: Record Sales, Strong Profit, and Insider Share Sales
Carvana reported third-quarter net revenue of $8.04 billion, up 42.4% year over year and above the $7.7 billion market estimate. Retail units sold reached a record 217,385, an increase of 39.4%. Net income rose to $483 million, while adjusted EBITDA reached a record $800 million, reflecting gains in both revenue and profitability.
Management expects full-year 2026 adjusted EBITDA to reach the upper end of its $2.7 billion to $3.0 billion range. Needham maintained its Buy rating, named Carvana a top pick in transportation technology, and set a $100 price target. Strong results and guidance have drawn investor attention, though continued performance will depend on sales, margins, and operating costs.
Insider transactions are also on investors’ radar. A regulatory filing indicates that CFO Mark Jenkins planned to sell 63,800 shares on November 2, 2026, valued at approximately $4.35 million. Since August, he has planned sales totaling 191,300 shares. An executive share sale alone does not determine a company’s outlook; investors may also consider earnings, cash flow, and future guidance. This article is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice.

FCEL Stock: Data Center Opportunity, Manufacturing Costs, and Lawsuit Risk
FuelCell Energy (ticker: FCEL) provides fuel-cell power solutions. Growing electricity demand from AI data centers could create new business opportunities, while proposed pauses on new data center approvals in some areas have raised concerns about project timelines. A 75-megawatt power project may be affected, and FCEL shares recently fell as much as about 17% in a single session amid policy concerns.
FCEL signed an agreement with Fit Energy to provide up to 380 megawatts of fuel-cell power solutions. Its backlog is approximately $3.6 billion, with about 97% of its sales pipeline related to data centers. The company also drew the second installment under a $49 million financing arrangement backed by an export credit agency, supporting a green energy project and clean-energy exports. Recent leadership changes include Matthew Latino becoming CFO, digital infrastructure executive Peter Hopper joining the board, and John Dansby leading manufacturing scale-up. Converting orders into revenue will depend on production capacity, costs, and project execution.
FCEL reported third-quarter revenue of about $33 million, down approximately 29% year over year, and a net loss of roughly $45.3 million. Product costs and manufacturing overhead for the Fit Energy agreement exceeded the contract pricing, resulting in an approximately $17 million contract impairment charge. Securities class-action allegations concern disclosures about manufacturing capacity and costs; the case remains in the legal process. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff is November 10, 2026. FCEL’s growth opportunities come with execution, financing, and litigation risks. This article is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice.

Democratic Party's AI Regulation Push Revealed: Plans for Intensive Legislation and Strict Scrutiny of Tech Giants

PFE Stock: Pfizer’s Q3 2026 Earnings, Business Strategy, and Dividend Outlook
PFE is the New York Stock Exchange ticker for Pfizer Inc. In the third quarter of 2026, Pfizer reported revenue of $16.58 billion and adjusted earnings per share of $0.87, both above market expectations. The company raised its full-year revenue outlook to $62 billion–$64 billion and its adjusted EPS guidance to $2.95–$3.05, pointing to stronger performance than previously expected.
Although demand for COVID-related products continues to decline, Pfizer’s non-COVID business is growing. Third-quarter sales reached $720 million for the cancer drug Padcev and $2.52 billion for Eliquis, up 25% year over year. Revenue from newer and acquired products rose 32%. Pfizer is expanding its oncology pipeline, entering the weight-loss treatment market through its acquisition of Metsera, and targeting approximately $9.7 billion in net cost savings by 2029. Cecile Guegan has also taken over as chief financial officer.
Investors are also watching Pfizer’s dividend and legal developments. The company declared a cash dividend of $0.43 per share, with an ex-dividend date of November 6, 2026. Analysts raised some earnings estimates and price targets following the quarterly results. Pfizer also faces ongoing legal scrutiny related to statements about COVID vaccine safety, while its subsidiary Mylan has sued Novo Nordisk over generic-drug patent issues involving Wegovy. Pfizer’s outlook depends on new-product growth, cost savings, patent matters, and litigation developments. This article is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice.








