Bitget Conversations with Trader Shiguang: Seeking the Discrepancy Between Price and Value
With 7 years of experience in A-shares, having gone through the crypto market and returned to traditional assets, Shiguang, now a Bitget VIP trader, focuses more on U.S. stock contract trading.
Having traversed different markets, he is increasingly certain that what truly interests him is not chasing the next price wave, but rather finding the discrepancies between price and value.
When the market is in panic, he looks for assets that have been unjustly punished; when valuations are too high, he is willing to stand on the other side of the market. However, this does not mean he always thinks he is right. On the contrary, he always leaves room for his judgments to be falsified.
Daring to go against the trend, but not stubborn. This is our deepest impression of Shiguang.
- The market provides prices, he seeks value
"Buy cheap, sell low" is the most direct summary of Shiguang's trading approach.
Prices can be very low or very high, but what he truly cares about is: what kind of value corresponds to this asset?
In Shiguang's view, market prices reflect the collective pricing of all participants regarding an asset at the moment, representing the market's consensus at that time. However, consensus changes with emotions, expectations, and capital flows; it describes the "now" but does not necessarily represent the true value of the asset itself.
This sense of distance between price and value is a trading intuition formed through years of trading experience.
He does not assume that an asset is more valuable just because its price has risen; nor does he think that an asset has become worthless just because its price has fallen. For him, price is primarily a market signal, not a trading conclusion. Trading opportunities arise only when there is a deviation between price and value.
As he puts it:
"Price tells you how the market is doing now, what everyone is thinking, but it doesn’t necessarily tell you how much it’s really worth."
- Assess value first, then wait for price
After forming his own judgment, Shiguang does not rush to trade.
For him, "buying cheap" first means waiting for the price to reach a level worth entering. Therefore, he will first form a judgment on the asset's value, then wait for the market to provide a more suitable price that falls within his entry range, thus capturing this "discrepancy."
This also means that he does not need to participate in every price fluctuation. When the price does not enter his judgment range, he can continue to wait; when a price opportunity arises, he executes his judgment.
However, this judgment also needs to be validated. Shiguang sets clear risk boundaries for his trades; when the overall account loss reaches about 5%, he chooses to exit rather than continue waiting for the market to return to his expectations.
First, form your own judgment, then wait for the price to provide an opportunity; if the judgment holds, execute it; if the judgment fails, exit.
- From macro to individual stocks, how to form judgments?
So, how does a trader judge whether there is a discrepancy between "price" and "value"?
Shiguang's answer is to look at macro, fundamentals, and technicals together.
The macro environment determines what he looks at. Federal Reserve policies, non-farm payrolls, geopolitical issues, U.S. Treasury yields, oil prices... these pieces of information are not isolated news to him but the background for judging market conditions and capital flows. When factors like interest rates and geopolitical issues change market risk preferences, he further observes which industries and assets may be affected.
Fundamentals determine why he trades. If a company's fundamentals have not deteriorated significantly, but its stock price has dropped sharply due to market panic, he will judge whether this decline is a revaluation of value or a temporary deviation caused by emotions. If it is the latter, he will look for prices that have been depressed by emotions, thus seizing this "discrepancy." This is also why he is willing to seek opportunities in times of panic.
Technicals help him decide when to trade. He mainly observes trends at the 1-hour and daily levels, as well as changes in trading volume. A daily trend forming alongside an increase in volume is an important signal for him to judge that the market may continue; while high-volume trading that fails to continue rising may become the basis for his exit.
Shiguang's judgment is a process of gradually converging layers: macro looks at the environment, fundamentals look at value, and technicals find the timing.
- From A-shares to Crypto, then to U.S. stocks: seeking a more suitable trading environment for judgment
Shiguang's trading path spans several completely different markets. However, if we look at these experiences through his trading logic, he has always focused on the assets themselves and the factors that influence their value.
This also means that external variables such as interest rates, oil prices, geopolitical issues, and macro policies can all become references for judging a company's and market's trends. Therefore, he needs a platform that can observe information from different assets and markets together to support efficient decision-making.
At Bitget, he mainly trades U.S. stock contracts and captures trading clues through market discovery and hot topic pushes; 24/7 U.S. stock trading, coverage of over 1000 stocks and ETFs, and a unified account allow multi-asset trading to be completed on the same platform.
For Shiguang, being a VIP further supplements this trading system: from industry dynamics and strategy content to Level 2 data, it helps him consolidate scattered multi-asset information into a basis for judging asset value.
- Beyond market consensus, retain your own judgment
Having traversed A-shares, crypto, and now U.S. stock contract trading, what Shiguang is always seeking is that point of discrepancy between market prices and asset values.
But what truly validates this trading approach is the ability to always maintain his own judgment and set boundaries for that judgment.
He is willing to seek opportunities during market panic and dares to go against market consensus, waiting for discrepancies to appear; but when prices and facts gradually prove that the original judgment is not valid, he is also willing to stop and acknowledge that the original judgment needs to be corrected.
Perhaps this is exactly how Shiguang interacts with the market: daring to go against the trend but not stubborn; adhering to his own judgment while respecting the answers given by the market.
The market will always provide new prices, and what Shiguang wants to do is to retain a judgment that belongs to him beyond the price.
This article is based on an interview with trader Shiguang, and the views expressed in it represent only the interviewee's personal opinions and do not constitute any investment advice. Contract trading is highly risky and may lead to the total loss of principal; please make decisions cautiously based on your own risk tolerance.
-- Price
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

Kraken Owner Invests in Altcoin, Considers Further Purchases. You Should Recognize Him

Nubank Suspends Crypto Withdrawals: What We Know So Far

Banking Outage in Japan: 128 Banks 'Frozen' at Once

Beyond APY: Saying Goodbye to Black Box Trust and Reassessing the Security Logic of ETH Staking

Democratic Party's AI Regulation Push Revealed: Plans for Intensive Legislation and Strict Scrutiny of Tech Giants

AI Begins to Shake Google's Search Advertising Business Behind $500 Billion Market Value Erosion

What is the real challenge for South Korean exchanges now that the regulatory framework is in place?

BlackRock Loses $1 Billion Through Bitcoin ETF

U.S. Stocks Plunge $2.8 Trillion Overnight! Top Silicon Valley VC Reveals: 90% of Open Source Model Spending Goes to China

Cassius Cuvee on Market Euphoria, High Leverage, and How to Stay in the Game

Why Did HYPE Soar and Then Fizzle Out After Wall Street Extended an Olive Branch?

What Did Crypto Investors Get for Their $189 Million Bet?

The Coming Crisis in AI Infrastructure: What About USD.AI?

JP Morgan Kinexys: How Should Banks Use Blockchain?

Current Chief Prosecutor: 'Public Disclosure of Actual Controllers Needed to Prevent Predatory Coin Issuance'

Midterm Elections Raise $3 Billion, Prediction Markets Emerge as Big Winners

Tether Earns $1.5 Billion in Q1: Where Does USDT's Revenue Come From?

Unpatched Bitcoin Lightning nodes face channel-draining bug

Claude's Evolution Speed Doubles, 80% of Increment Comes from AI

BCRA has already purchased over $16 billion this year, but reserves fell due to a payment to the IMF

Circle Reports US$ 226 Million Profit, But Shares Drop 9%: What Happened

Brazil's Economy Minister stated that the Selic rate should be reduced, but in a "sustainable" manner

A Counterintuitive Logic: The Anti-AI Movement Won't Eliminate Demand, But It Gives the Industry More Time to Absorb the Bubble

How to Determine Loss Attribution When DeFi Issues Arise?

Bank of England Raises Interest Rates: What Changes for Investors

Does Anyone Really Need Blockchain? Reflections Triggered by Kalshi

Post-Quantum Era Consensus Layer Divergence: Ethereum Maintains Decentralization, Monad Prioritizes Speed

Hunter Biden Discusses Meme Coin 'LAPTOP': Design for Transparency and Recommendations for the Democratic Party

Why Did Institutions Bet $40 Million on PhotonPay When Stablecoin Transfers Are Cheap Enough?












